Comparison: Make and Pantarey
Make (formerly Integromat) and Pantarey pursue different approaches to digitizing workflows. Make offers visual automation building blocks for integrations and workflows, while Pantarey models, controls, and analyzes processes holistically. Both solutions can coexist but address different requirements.
Target Groups and Use Cases
Make targets teams that want to quickly create integrations between cloud applications or prototype individual automations. The focus is on flexibility and detailed control over data flows. Pantarey addresses companies that need to design end-to-end processes, define responsibilities, and map governance requirements. The platform combines process modeling, data management, and analysis functions in one environment.
Modeling and Control
Make uses a canvas-based interface where modules are connected via drag-and-drop. Branches and error handling are possible but remain at the workflow level. Pantarey relies on BPMN as a standardized notation. Processes can be versioned, tested, and enriched with service and user tasks. Decision rules, escalations, and deadlines are integral parts of the models.
Architecture and Operations
Make operates as a cloud service but requires maintaining individual scenarios and resource planning with growing usage. Pantarey is based on a serverless infrastructure that automatically scales and separates tenants from each other. The platform itself handles operations, security, and updates. Organizations focus on designing their business logic.
Data Management and Transparency
In Make, data predominantly remains in source and target systems; the platform processes it temporarily. Persistent data models or reporting functions must be built externally. Pantarey defines data objects centrally via JSON Schema and stores them audit-proof. Events are deposited in a data lake and are available for evaluations, monitoring, and audits.
Governance and Collaboration
Make offers role-based access and version histories at the scenario level but primarily targets automation specialists. Pantarey anchors governance more deeply: tenant separation, approval processes, and documentation are part of the platform. Business departments can model and coordinate processes in a shared interface.
Comparison
| Aspect | Make | Pantarey |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Integration workflows | Process digitalization |
| Modeling | Visual canvas, module-based | BPMN with versioning |
| Data management | Temporary processing | Central JSON data models |
| Operations | Cloud service with scenario management | Serverless, multi-tenant platform |
| Analysis | Focus on throughput and error messages | Data lake evaluations, monitoring |
| Governance | Roles and logs per scenario | Holistic governance and approvals |
Summary
Make automates workflows – Pantarey designs them holistically.